Case Study: Nauseous In The Heat
The Setting
You and three friends have been hiking 18-20 miles a day for three days in the U.S.'s desert southwest. It’s been hard and hot, as anticipated. You’ve found water every day.
This afternoon you backpacked over a steep, sun-drenched sandstone ridge and down into a cottonwood glade. One of your companions has been lagging behind and eventually stops and sits by the side of the trail. He is sweaty and says he feels awful.
Your scene size up is brief; no hazards, one patient who looks sick and sat down.
You think about BSI (body substance isolation) but keep your limited glove supply in your first aid kit for now. The patient agrees to your assessment; he has a sound airway, is breathing without distress, is dressed in only shorts and t-shirt, is obviously not bleeding, has a strong radial pulse and is on dry ground in the shade on a nice warm day.
SOAP Report
Subjective
The patient is a 24-year-old male who states he “feels lousy.” He has been backpacking long distances for three days in hot weather (highs in the low 90’s F) and this afternoon became too weak to hike.
Objective
Patient Exam:
Patient sat down by the side of the trail. There is no mechanism for injury. No obvious injuries were found in a head-to-toe assessment. Patient is sweating. Skin is not hot to the touch and the patient has a normal mental status.
Vital Signs:
Time: 13:00
Level of Responsiveness (LOR): A+OX4
Heart Rate (HR): 100, strong, regular
Respiratory Rate (RR): 18, regular, easy
Skin Color, Temperature, Moisture (SCTM): Pink mucous membranes, warm and moist
Blood Pressure (BP): Strong radial and pedal pulse present
Pupils: PERRL
Temperature (T°): Not taken
History:
Symptoms: Patient states he is dizzy, nauseous and “feels lousy”
Allergies: None stated
Medications: Occasional ibuprofen at 400-600mg for muscle soreness during the hike, none taken today
Pertinent Hx: Patient denies any ongoing medical conditions.
Last in/out: Patient drank 3 liters of fluid so far today, ate breakfast and ongoing trail snacks, urinated a light yellow urine twice today and stated this is normal on long hikes. He had a normal bowel movement this morning. Denies recent diarrhea or vomiting.
Events: Patient has been hiking in hot, dry weather for three days, 18-20 miles per day without problems. He has not fallen or suffered any injuries.
STOP READING!
What is your assessment and plan? Take a few minutes to figure out your own assessment and make a plan. Don’t cheat—no reading on without answering this first!
Assessment
Possible heat illness/exhaustion. Normal mental status suggests heat stroke is unlikely.
Possible flu-like illness
Plan
Rest in shade and repeat assessment: carefully exploring hydration history.
Have patient drink fluids and eat salty snacks, monitor urine output
Make a decision on continuing hike or evacuation based on patient condition.
Anticipated problems
Patient does not improve and we have to evacuate.
Comments: Vague Symptoms
The vague complaint of “feel lousy” could be any number of things, although the environment makes you think of heat and hydration problems. The head-to-toe didn’t reveal any obvious abnormalities.
As you’ve been with this person for three days and you’ve all been diligent about hydration, you’re considering that they should not be under or over-hydrated. They look like they could be sick, but this came on suddenly and your group has been healthy on the hike. It’s low enough that altitude illness is not high on your list of possibilities, nor is a hangover. The patient is not diabetic and seems to have been eating well, so blood sugar abnormalities are not obvious.
You considered a worst case scenario of heat stroke, but note the normal mental status. Your plan is to explore the hydration history again.
Assuming he is well hydrated without confirming intake and output can lead to poor decisions and treatment plans. Three liters might be too little today—plus, dehydration can be cumulative over several days. Since there are no obvious evacuation triggers, you decide to monitor the patient to see if he gets better or worse.
Comments on Leadership in Wilderness Medicine
Wilderness medicine is commonly low drama and routine problems; flu-like illness, mild/moderate stages of environmental problems, sore muscles, minor cuts and scrapes. Early intervention keeps these minor problems from becoming significant concerns. So much of sound wilderness medicine is also sound outdoor leadership.
When there is nothing obviously dire in the patient’s presentation, we consider the worst case, see if we can rule anything out, treat for multiple problems, and see if the patient gets better or worse. A worst case would be heat stroke, which is not apparent in this patient whose skin is not hot and who has normal mental status. The hydration history suggests that hyponatremia from drinking too much, or dehydration from drinking too little, are both unlikely.
We often treat for multiple problems at the same time, throwing a wide net over the problem. Heat stress and possible dehydration are managed by seeking shade, resting and supporting hydration, which also treats a possible flu-like illness. If our net doesn’t help the patient get better, we evacuate.
Patience with our patients is a virtue in wilderness medicine. We want to fix problems quickly, yet we often get ill slowly, and better slowly.
One of the traps of the short scenarios common in wilderness medicine courses is the illusion that people get better quickly. People may be physically in wilderness, but often act like they are in a city, with expectations for quick solutions to inconveniences, let alone real problems. This group acted as if they were in the wilderness. They changed their plans, stopped the hike, and rested and cared for their companion.
